Archive Page 2

03
Jun
10

lose brand focus at your peril

We recently helped one of our clients as they developed their brand proposition and key messaging, aligning this with their strategic direction.  It’s what we do.

These kinds of projects are always a valuable reminder of the need to stay focused on the core elements of a brand and the values that support it. Continually stressing the importance of this focus in each and every meeting becomes a critical part of a successful brand strategy – yet clearly some organisations appear to lose that focus, often very suddenly and with dire consequences.

While doing this exercise we saw a new report by “Which? Magazine” on the best and worst of UK retailers. What struck a chord in this survey was how many organisations, even traditionally great ones, can so easily lose their way and devalue the brand they have spent many years building. Practical, real life experience over the last few days has strongly reinforced this.

We make no claims to be retail experts but we do think we are pretty good at strategic marketing and reputation management. The core rules apply to almost any industry or sector.

The winners in that survey, organisations like Richer Sounds and Lakeland, have a clear strategic direction, values staff happily live and breathe, and a focus on customer benefits that bring their brands to life in a way that adds value to them and to the people who enjoy the buying experience with them.

Unfortunately the same cannot be said of all big name retailers.

The Which? report had W H Smith bottom of the league table for customer satisfaction. Quoting some of the survey participants, this seemed to boil down to a sense of a business that has lost its strategic direction and the values that have underpinned many decades of success. “It is just not the same any more” one respondent said and this seemed to sum it all up for everyone.

Once upon a time W H Smith was the place to go for books, newspapers, magazines, music, and stationery. But today, if you look at the core product categories that Smith’s are focusing on, (assuming you can find your way through the stack it high, sell it cheap(-ish) shop layouts that are endemic now across the Smith’s retail network) then in every category somebody else does it better.

With books they are blown away by Waterstones; Ryman wins the stationery war easily; HMV has the better of them on music, film and gaming. And the family friendly Smith’s of old is now one of the biggest retailers of soft porn and tobacco products in the country – though it could be argued that it is rational to shift away from a family orientation if the rest of the country has!

So if they are not the best in category, are they the best for service? Regrettably, no.

The same day, at different ends of the country, we experienced the same, sad deterioration in staff attitude and customer service. In Gatwick Airport a shop assistant took apparent delight in telling a patient queue that she wasn’t paid enough to worry about complaining customers (he wasn’t complaining, he was asking a reasonable question which if dealt with properly would have enhanced his, and our, opinion of W H Smith.)

Same day, same company, same poor service, but this time in Liverpool – and a refusal to go and find a bag for a customer who was spending a significant amount of money. Once again, this alienated a whole queue of people who saw this as the way they were going to be treated when it came to their turn.

In contrast, on the same day as our dire Smith’s experience, we were positively engaged in a discussion with a sales person in Waterstones who was knowledgeable, helpful, and saw it as his role to inform and share his knowledge with customers – core values of the brand were epitomised in that one transaction.

Are Waterstones more expensive than Smith’s? We don’t really care anymore, but not when you compare their special offers, and certainly not expensive enough to make the Smith‘s experience tolerable or acceptable. In fact, on DVDs, all that can be said is that there is very rarely a price advantage at WH Smith and there is limited range. Even Tescos now can compete sharply on price for blockbusters that you may have missed first time around.

The point of all of this is not to have a go at W H Smith but to show how a business that loses its way strategically and loses the involvement of its staff can very rapidly lose its reputation – and sees plummeting brand value as a consequence. Unfortunately W H Smith seems to have forgotten all the basics we learn as young marketers. They seem to be drifting inexorably down the same commercial route as Woolworth, another great company that lost its brand focus and couldn’t recover it in time to avoid oblivion. Indeed, one has a sneaking suspicion that someone somewhere, as the credit crunch unfolded, thought that here was a gap in the market to be filled and forgot that recessions are relatively short term compared to reputations.

Any branding expert will tell you that your people are your brand; the way you behave and the way you treat your customer is your brand; and your brand equity is a critical part of your business value.

So be clear about what you do, how you do it and what you value. If your strategy is to be a cut price operator that doesn’t mean you have to cut service levels, quite the opposite in fact. But if you keep your brand values and your core proposition constantly at the forefront of your thinking and doing, then you will prosper and grow – lose it and a slow painful demise is almost guaranteed, certainly probable.

29
May
10

social media at the top end of the food chain …

Why should social media matter to a business or professional services firm? This is still not an easy question to answer, especially as most of the answers for most senior executives and partners are based on fear, whether of a reputational blunder, of lost time or of a legal liability.

Let us be clear. There are risks. And the costs of engagement with social media are high in time. Similarly, the most touted channels are still quite clunky and unfocused for business communications, while the ongoing privacy debate has made them far less likely to be useful for marketeers.

Even those qualities that make the public love them – especially the speed of direct engagement with the news – also help to turn these media into transient tools in which immense effort goes into the chance of one sight of a message that cannot easily be repeated by people who cannot be tracked easily.

At the end of the day, as with other traditional advertising media, we cannot know that our target was noticing our message while the format of social media encourages screening out and gives power to the consumer to edit out commercial messages and the people who promote them.

Claims of an ‘instant dialogue’ between company or firm and customer and client are too often theoretical ones. A company’s message will wash over the customer at the margins of perception in a way no different from newspaper or broadcast advertising and it remains the older blog tool where informed postings excite informed commentary. This is where the dialogue of the informed really takes place.

A first bit of advice to any professional or executive is to master the blogs and the online journals that matter to you and to think, with care for liability, how you can engage with your peers in a literate and informed manner.

If there is a gap in the blog information market, some areas in which your expertise can be presented to your public without giving away the intellectual property that sustains your business model, then consider filling it yourself.

Consider also that the entire social media system might be used as a huge free intelligence system in which some basic upfront investment can gain its return in a flow of news that is highly specific to your business needs – and to which you can react in the marketplace faster than your competitors.

This business intelligence value cuts both ways, of course. If you go to a business intelligence firm and ask them to investigate some rival or threat, they will undoubtedly charge you a high sum just to do what you could do by working through the internet – and that means dossiers can also be built up on you through your web footprint.

Managing your and your company’s identity on the internet, which means having effective guidelines for employees, is now a necessary part of defensive intelligence. No executive or partner should engage in this world without understanding privacy controls (and returning to them frequently) or understanding what sort of person is likely to be in the groups that they join or are behind the anonymous ‘follows’. If in doubt, don’t shout it out!

But, on the plus side, social media can be used both as a broadcasting tool (if you can attract the right listeners who connect regularly using tools like Tweetdeck or a mobile application) and as a listening tool – for example, using Twitter lists to build up news channels from specialist Followers.

During the Right2Link Campaign earlier this year, we used Twitter not only to communicate with our natural allies, with a feed to the web site, but we created channels that told us separately what was going on in the political lobby, what was going on amongst the industrial interests concerned, what the general political mood was as election fever mounted and what activists were saying.

What this meant was that we had a virtuous circle by which we pulled information out of the system and re-circulated it to add value to our supporters and then added our own news and action points within a context of being ‘useful’.

Supporters would then engage with us and were more likely to join our campaign and sign the official e-petition. This campaign was a relatively low cost late entry into a political process but, using and integrating multiple channels, it managed to get its core message – the defence of the public’s right to link – into the media, amongst key influencers and, with the support of public affairs associate Portcullis Public Affairs, into Parliament.

Social media are still in their early stage of development. We have been wary of the hype and the specialists because, in the unformed state of the market, a lot of companies are in danger of spending a great deal of time into being seduced by ‘experts’ into a nerdy monitoring operation driven by fear – a sort of neurotic worry about what is being said behind twitching net curtains.

Similarly, though there are stars of the internet with real reach who can turn your brand into fashion or disgrace in a moment, the reality for most businesses and professional services is that they are never going to be in this league. A few hours thought can save a few days blundering by concentrating on classic marketing issues.

  1. Who exactly do I want to reach? Adding followers for the sake of followers is absurd: engagement with social media has to be focused and, for most new entrants, this means serious research into a difficult problem – gathering together your market and getting it to subscribe to your channels. You will not get all your targets into one place at the time that you want so, unless you are highly specialist or important, you must expect to use social media alongside other tools (especially networking) rather than as a substitute for them.
  2. What do you expect to get from your actions? The problem with social media is that each channel has multiple uses – from broadcasting a brand through to gaining intelligence via attempts to get into dialogue for sales or alliance.  This goes against all traditional thinking where command and control of message is central, where interactivity and questioning is discouraged except at point of sale and where the various uses of information (outwards in sales and marketing and inwards in research and business intelligence) are often compartmentalised internally. In this brave new world, the integration of the flow of information may require new management thinking with two separate trends competing – increased pressure to centralise information coming in and increased pressure to decentralise information going out.
  3. How do I manage risk? Risk is becoming salient and not merely in the historic sense of product liability or protection of intellectual property or market change. Two ‘risks’ compete for attention – the risk that a business or firm will be left behind if it fails to engage with these new media and the risk that engagement will create new reputational and even legal liabilities. Since successful use of the new social media relies on its freedom and its interactivity, some serious thinking is required on the balance of risk and it is probably the area on which we have become most engaged in recent months as consultants. We have already been involved in projects to find out how, legitimately, safe use of social media for marketing purposes can be managed within strict internal and even statutory compliance guidelines and it has led us to some innovative models already.
  4. Do I have something to say? This is perhaps most important of all because, if there is one thing we have learned from our own involvement in this area, it is that messages need repeating but the market is impatient of repetition – interest in you requires that you show respect for your audience by being useful. And to be useful means either passing on information that is genuinely adding value from other sources (even, if necessary, competitor content under the right conditions in order to develop debate) or creating your own high quality content which you need to launder through the social media system at high speed and without irritating your market by ‘shouting’.

Above all, we would argue against both an excess of fear and an excess of enthusiasm. As always, there is a happy balance to seek.

The ideal social media strategy for the larger B2B will be focused. It will loosen up the internal constraints on engagement but grant communications rights only to those who understand or can be trained in the risks and rules of the game. It will pre-research the channels and focus efforts only on those that pull in the information the company needs and that engages with people of use.  Above all, content is king – there is no social media programme without high quality content that is of interest to the market.

In the end, as it develops into a system, social media will change aspects of corporate organisation. The flow of information from and to a corporation will never be the same again.

It is already having a revolutionary effect on private life. Those engaged in social media have become better informed (even if more vulnerable to ‘conspiracy theory’ or disinformation) and more able to develop an identity that suits them rather than one based on a few personal connections that are met intermittently. The best corporate users of social media will also be better informed and be in more control of their brand identity as the market changes – these will be the rewards of intelligent investment now.

18
May
10

Regulation and risk – can they really deliver a competitive edge?

How risk management and regulation can help drive the future health and growth of the industry has been the theme of the afternoon session of the Ernst & Young Global Insurance Conference in Paris.

The audience was clear that the improved business integration of risk management was the most significant change to recent management practices since the financial crisis, with 44% flagging this up in the electronic poll. But how did the experts see it?

Tim Harris, Deputy Group CFO of Aviva, was clear that risk management could be a driver of performance but there had to be a balance between the right kind of risk and no risk at all – hitting the “sweet spot” as he described it. He urged the industry to continue to take calculated risk for the benefit of consumers and the business alike – “it’s what we do and have always done,” he stressed. The key is just getting better at it – “it’s all about implementation”.

However, Antoine Lissowski of CNP Assurances raised concerns that the new rules on risk were so complex that management of the business and those charged with oversight like audit committees would struggle to understand what they were looking at.

Kevin Griffith of Ernst & Young, in true accounting style, asked if Regulation is an Inhibitor or Enabler of growth and gave a perfectly balanced answer! On the one hand more unwanted change, high costs and lack of resources and systems at breaking point were all inhibitors of growth for the industry. In contrast, Kevin argued that a single global standard for the industry, convergence in reporting and the opportunity to reshape the finance function to allow the CFO to add real value to the organisation were significant enablers of growth.

Insurance is undoubtedly a complex business and the ever increasing demands of regulation and risk management are making it no less easy to understand for the layman as for the non executive director. But there are a lot of positives for the industry to take forward from the crisis.

The damage done to the industry during the crisis was much less than the impact on the banks, and indeed the one notable insurer failure, AIG, was largely due to practices that were closer to banking than insurance, noted Munich Re’s Joachim Oechlin. He also noted that the industry had eventually survived the crisis relatively unharmed.

If there was a lesson to be learned from the crisis, the conference delegates seem to suggest it was that building risk management into the fabric of the business is the best way to protect themselves and their customers. As Tim Harris commented, the “key is driving explicit optimised performance decisions”, keeping the connection between the customer and the commercial aspects of the business clearly in focus. If risk management is applied properly it can do just that and that will give the competitive edge that everyone is seeking.




 

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Copyright

©2009-2010 The Pendry White Partnership Limited. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Pendry White and Whiteboard with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Share